Jump to content

Golden Nuggets of Production Advice


27 replies to this topic

#1
wisefox

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts
wanted to start an interesting thread, partly to curb my bordom at work, but also to hopefully find some more of these gems.

the question is - what were those golden peices of production advice you've heard over the years that really effected/changed your approach/sound? i'm not asking for your well kept production secrets, even things you feel are pretty basic could well have been overlooked or unknown to those fairly new to the game.

i guess a really elementary example for me relates to the use of filters and eq to create a space for each sound - when i started doing this, i noticed a drastic change from my previously muddy mixes (although they're still far from great).

i've only really been producing for about 18 months so its things like this that are, well.. worth their weight in gold.. so to speak.  :;)

bring on the farkin nuggets!  :D

Posted Image

#2
Captain Terrific

    VIP Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,852 posts
  • LocationEarth
great thread idea!


2 gems given to me some time ago that have changed the way i mix

*Anything under 300hz should be mono
*Give every sound it's own space

#3
wisefox

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts
nice - i have heard that under 300hz tip before but i'm not sure i completely get it... if its a stereo soft synth do you bounce it to audio and run it on a mono audio channel? or do you use a plugin that ahh.. monofies it??

#4
Anders

    Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 131 posts
there are plug-ins around that will make anything under a certain frequency mono. I use bx_digital. a trick I have done recently is duplicate the track and filter it so one track is HF and one if LF. Then put a stereo slap delay or something on the HF track but leave the LF un-touched.

I'll bring some gold to the table soon ;)

#5
Captain Terrific

    VIP Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,852 posts
  • LocationEarth

Quote

... or do you use a plugin that ahh.. monofies it??

yup - otiumFX BassLane VST

this plug gets used in every single project i do, soooo handy

monofie  <---- 10 points for making up a new word too  ;D

#6
wisefox

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts
haha i'm suprised its not the technical term!

anyone know a good monofier for Mac?? (bx_digital is a bit out of my price range at the moment)

#7
VUMod

    Punk

  • VU Music
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Quote

a trick I have done recently is duplicate the track and filter it so one track is HF and one if LF. Then put a stereo slap delay or something on the HF track but leave the LF un-touched.


I like doing a smilar thing with flanger/phaser on the top end. Especially on things like vocals and drum kit, I split the signal in two, and run lo-pass on one cutting at about 5-7kHz and the other hi-pass cutting also at 5-7kHz. Add phaser/flanger to the hi-pass channel. Adds a nice movement to a vocal when they sing the 's' sibilances but leaves the body of the vocal alone. Also works a treat to add movement to hi hats.

#8
rhythmboy

    VIP Member

  • Global Moderators
  • 2,421 posts
  • LocationAustralia
^  :bang: did it again, wrong login - for those not familiar with my schizophrenic tendencies ISAMod is RBMod and vice versa :)

#9
ehsan

    SoundPunk Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,179 posts
OMG! The truth comes out!!!

#10
Its Too Loud

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts
i Don't know how much this actaully yhas to do with mixing, but the avice i normally give out is *If its wet drink it, If it dry smoke it, If it moves fuck it, if it doesn't move put it on the fucking truck!*

#11
neo

    SoundPunk Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts

Quote

haha i'm suprised its not the technical term!

anyone know a good monofier for Mac?? (bx_digital is a bit out of my price range at the moment)

Logic :P

#12
dylab

    SoundPunk Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 878 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
here is a bass monofier for ableton users
coutesy of Monosylabik

http://www.msbkonline.com/?p=112

he has a bunch of useful ableton tools/patches in there

#13
wisefox

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Quote

Logic :P

logic has one?? winner! will check that out when i get home.

#14
neo

    SoundPunk Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
Yup, there's a Logic plug called "Direction Mixer" which is in the imaging plugins folder. One of the presets is called Stereo to Mono. Couldn't be easier!

Alternatively you could just bus the output of a stereo track to the input of a mono track.

#15
Spectrum

    "Organised Noise"

  • Global Moderators
  • 3,077 posts

Quote

the question is - what were those golden peices of production advice you've heard over the years that really effected/changed your approach/sound?

For me, one of those light bulb moments was getting a grip on how the musical keyboard's octaves aligned with audio frequencies which in turn aligned with the sound range we hear.

1 octave up  = double the frequency.
1 octave down = halve the frequency.


So, with Middle A = 440 Hz...

Working down:
220Hz = A -1 octave
110Hz = A -2 octaves
55Hz = A -3 octaves
22.5Hz = A -4 octaves

And working up:
880Hz = A +1 octave
1760Hz = A +2 octaves
3520Hz = A +3 octaves
7040Hz = A +4 octaves
14080Hz = A +5 octaves

Suddenly I understood how our hearing range (20Hz to 20,000Hz on a good day) fit into the musical realm.

And then EQ, especially parametric EQ with its infinitely tweakable frequency range and shape, became less stab-in-the-dark and I could then target my adjustments with both a greater vision and precision.

Frequencies in the lower registers are so far more important than frequencies in the upper registers. Consider that the 8-notes that span one of the lower bass octaves (such as 55Hz through 110Hz) is considerably narrow, and where one must be very specific when chiseling at the frequencies with an EQ. Just a few Hertz either side and one's targeting a completely different musical note.

Whereas at the upper end of the scale (such as 3520Hz through 7040Hz), the same 8-note span is now spread across literally thousands of hertz increments meaning a more general, wider sweep of the EQ brush is all that's required (unless there's some sort of ringing-like tone one's attempting to eliminate/highlight).

My next major lightbulb moment came when I got a grip on how an everyday sound is typically constructed. It begins with a lower frequency (fundamental) that provides it with its body. This foundation is then layered with a series of progressive higher (harmonic) frequencies that give it its character or timbre.

So while a concert piano might have it's Middle A tuned to a perfect 440Hz, it's full of harmonics way above 440Hz that give a piano its distinctive sound, yet there's virtually nothing below 440Hz for this note. Take away those upper harmonics and the piano becomes dull, muffled and characterless, sounding less like a piano (and approaching a pure sine wave). Take away the 440Hz, and the still-recognisable piano becomes thinner and more brittle without the fundamental to give it a firm foundation.

Simple, huh?!

And a great thread idea!  :cans:


And I know there's a similar topic already running on here, so I might see if I can merge them somehow...

#16
Spectrum

    "Organised Noise"

  • Global Moderators
  • 3,077 posts
And here's a visual pic of those note-to-frequency relationships...

(Source: http://www.bestpiano...piano-keys.html )


(N.B. You need to be logged-in to view attachments on SoundPunk)

#17
Vagrant Producer

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 403 posts
awesome post spec, thanks - thats just what I have wanted to know, but always seem to forget to look up!! arse pluck can work but knowing is sooo much better.

#18
TankF

    Gold Punk

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 347 posts
Spectrum - Marry me! Very fucking interesting/helpful tip. Big thanks!

#19
v904

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
Thanks Spectrum, I like that chart *print* (fuck I'm outta ink)

#20
Spectrum

    "Organised Noise"

  • Global Moderators
  • 3,077 posts
Cool guys! 'Tis nice to be able to share the love around. :o





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users